By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Expanding the definition of what senior means
Platteville Senior Center seeks 50-plus people
DSC 6053
The Platteville Senior Center held a birthday party in March for Platteville residents in their 90s.

How old is a “senior citizen”?

Some would argue 60. Others would claim the early retirement age of 62, or the original Social Security retirement age of 65. Anyone born since 1960 has a retirement age of 60.

The Platteville Senior Center is endeavoring to extend its programs to people who start receiving materials from the American Association of Retired Persons.

“Our mission is to provide a warm and relaxing place away from home for people over 50,” said Connie Steinhoff, the Senior Center’s director and only full-time employee. “A lot of people who come here are in transitions in their lives — they’ve lost a spouse, they’ve lost siblings, their children have moved away. It’s a place to connect, and that’s so important. That allows them to stay in Platteville and contribute to the community.

The goal to extend the center’s programs beyond traditional “senior-citizen” age prompted Steinhoff to request an additional staff position from the Platteville Common Council to be added to Steinhoff and her two part-time employees. The council approved her request as a limited-term position through the rest of this year, with the position likely to be considered as part of the city’s 2014 budget deliberations.

“I’ve been blessed to work with the best people here and the best staff,” said Steinhoff, the Senior Center’s director since 2007. “The people who come here, it’s a really important place for them to come here.”

To meet the population in their 50s, the Senior Center is now open Thursday nights, tied to the Music in the Park series, and Saturdays from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m., tied to the Platteville Farmers Market.

“They have different interests,” said Steinhoff of the 50-something set. “A lot of seniors don’t have interest in playing cards, and that’s a lot of what we do in the daytime. So we’re open for events on nights and weekends. One of the objectives is to introduce the Senior Center to younger seniors, but also to expand our programs to all seniors.”

The Platteville Senior Center is the only senior-citizen facility located in the same building as that city’s senior meal site. The meal site offers dinners with an estimated cost of $9.25 for a suggested donation of $3.50.

“It’s a great partnership,” said Steinhoff. “It’s like pumpkin pie and whipped cream. It’s great to have senior citizens utilizing services in one place.”

The City of Platteville funds the center’s building and utility expenses, as well as its vehicles, as part of its $65,000 annual budget. The center’s bus does triple duty over the lunch hour, delivering people to the meal site, delivering around 30 meals to homes, and then delivering patrons back to their homes.

Senior Center programming includes speakers and educational opportunities, including a nutritionist who puts on monthly programs, plus music, cards, bingo, exercise, and trips. A Milwaukee Brewers tailgate party and Green Bay Packers party are on the schedule. The center has a computer that can be checked out, iPads, exercise equipment and a Wii. Around 150 to 175 people visit each week.

“We’re a real positive place,” said Steinhoff. “For as many people as come here you’d think there’d be conflict, but people who come here and the staff, we’re well matched.”

The Senior Center’s annual Senior Picnic will be at the United Methodist Church in Platteville Wednesday, Aug. 28 from 4 to 8 p.m. The picnic is moving from Legion Park to accommodate indoor and outdoor activities. Country Kitchen and Dairy Queen in Platteville is catering the picnic.

 

It was quite an election
On April 1
Election Results_April 1, 2025 Crawford County

Politics-weary Wisconsin citizens mustered the verve to once again go to the polls in Wisconsin’s April 1 spring election. With record spending, a barrage of campaign literature in mailboxes, chaos on the federal level, and an endless stream of divisive TV advertising, voters on both sides turned out in record numbers to support the candidates of their choice.

Happy or sad, it’s likely the vast majority is just glad it’s over. While most spring elections draw much lower turnout than a presidential election, voter turnout in this year’s race was on par with last November’s contentious election in which Donald Trump defeated Kamala Harris for the office of President of the United States.

Of course, the Wisconsin Supreme Court election took top billing, garnering record amounts of spending. Conservative versus liberal control of the court was on the line with the retirement of liberal justice Ann Walsh Bradley. Contending for the 10-year term were Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel and Dane County Judge Susan Crawford.

The race was called for Crawford around 10 p.m. after Schimel called her to concede. The unofficial results show Crawford winning with 55% of the statewide vote to Schimel’s 45%.

Crawford County voters bucked recent electoral trends, carrying for the liberal candidate. In the county, Crawford took 51% of the vote, defeating Schimel with 49%. Crawford’s candidacy also prevailed in Vernon County with 54% of the vote, Richland County with 52% of the vote, La Crosse County with 63% of the vote, Sauk County with 57% of the vote, Iowa County with 62% of the vote, and Green County with 58% of the vote. Crawford’s victory was propelled by massive turnout and majorities in Dane, Milwaukee, Rock, Eau Claire and Bayfield counties. Voters in Dane County cast 82% of their votes for Crawford, in Milwaukee County 75%, in Rock County 61%, in Eau Claire 63%, and in Bayfield 61%.

Schimel’s campaign prevailed locally in Grant, Lafayette and Monroe counties, earning 52%, 51%, and 55% of votes cast respectively.

Incumbents prevail

It was also a night for incumbent candidates to prevail in races pertaining to public education in the state. Incumbent Wisconsin State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jill Underly won her race against charter school advocate Brittany Kinser, taking 53% of the statewide vote to Kinser’s 47%.

Locally, Underly outperformed Supreme Court candidate Susan Crawford, winning her contest in counties that carried for Waukesha County judge Brad Schimel. Those counties include Grant and Lafayette counties, where Underly took 52% of votes cast. Kinser held on to votes cast for Schimel in Monroe County, taking 56% of votes cast.

Underly’s candidacy prevailed in Crawford, Vernon, Richland, Iowa, Sauk, and La Crosse counties. In those counties, Underly took 53%, 54%, 56%, 61%, 57%, and 61% respectively.

Mirroring the results in the statewide Superintendent of Public Instruction race, incumbent candidates Jerry Coleman and Charissa Richter prevailed against challengers Jesse Swenson and Melany Jelinek winning two three-year terms on the North Crawford School Board.

Coleman was the top vote-getter, with 660 votes, followed by Richter with 532 votes. Richter and challenger Melany Jelinek ran neck-in-neck for much of the night until results came in for the villages of Gays Mills and Bell Center, which pushed Richter over the finish line ahead. Jelinek finished with 502 votes, and Swenson with 412 votes.

Coleman took the most votes in the towns of Clayton, Haney, Scott, Utica, and in the villages of Bell Center, Gays Mills, and Soldiers Grove. Richter took the second most votes in the towns of Clayton, Haney, Scott, and Utica, and in the villages of Gays Mills and Soldiers Grove. Jelinek took more votes than Richter in the town of Freeman, and in the villages of Bell Center and Mt. Sterling.

Voter ID

Voters across the state voted to amend the Wisconsin Constitution to require photo identification to vote. The measure failed only in Dane and Milwaukee counties. Wisconsin had already required voters to show identification, but passage of the Republican-backed ballot question will make it harder for that requirement to be removed by the courts or the state legislature.

Statewide, the measure passed with 63% of the vote, with 37% of the voters voting against it.